Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
![Glenn Beck\](http://img.youtube.com/vi/1mKhwybJkyg&feature=youtube_gdata/2.jpg "Glenn Beck\") |
Glenn Beck's EARTH DAY REPLAY -- Wacko Environmental Predictions (From 1970) Posted by: EnvironWacko
Video duration: 125 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Further Reading: Global Warming - Climate Change - Energy - Recycling - Pollution
Latest articles: Facts about solar energy ~ Pros and cons of solar energy ~ How does solar energy work ~ Solar energy advantages disadvantages ~ Types of energy ~ Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy ~ Who are the world's 1 renewable energy site? ~ How does recycling affect the environment? ~ Why is recycling so important? ~ Interesting recycling facts ~ Natural causes of global warming ~ Is global warming real? ~ Safe and clean energy ~ Effects of water pollution ~ Types of water pollution ~ Land pollution ~ Poems about pollution ~ Definition of climate change ~ Fiji social capital community meetings climate change
Latest comments made on this video:
By: Kategunster. on 27 Apr 11, 12:33:28
Did he really just act like famine in third world countries was not that? bad ? .. Im pretty sure he said "glad we live here" WHAT AN ASSHOLE
By: gareof. on 23 Apr 11, 16:12:44
Glenn tried to have Gore on with him, so Al could explain these Inconvenient Truths from 1970.... I seem to remember some 'environmentalists' in the 1980's 90's clinging to their catasrophic lies - as long as their books keep selling - Gore's books etc. keep on selling...maybe that's why he wouldn't come on the air with Glenn or anyone? else.
By: Prepwns. on 24 Oct 10, 22:00:41
wow i hate this guy. he seems to completely avoid the fact that starting right after 1970 some of the largest? environmental programs and regulations were implemented by the U.S. government, so actually we have avoided some of the more moderate predictions (such as the sunlight prediction; look up Linfen, China). And has he even looked at the malnutrition statistics for the undeveloped world? incredible...
By: RadarKat73080. on 02 Aug 10, 21:54:25
Yeah we need? to listen to people who NEVER change their minds based on new data. Leeches were good enough for George Washington, of course he died as a resolute of being bled for disease.
By: niriop. on 26 Jul 10, 01:26:27
Yeah! I mean who needs these "expects" anyway! I mean they are only right 95% of the time! And we all know that free market could close the gap if just the government didn't get in? the way with their communist "experts"! Motherfucking statist Nazis! I rely on Penn and Teller for most stuff anyway! RON PAUL 2012!!!
By: shooter686. on 21 Jul 10, 17:39:34
Showing just how? bad so-called "experts" are at making predictions.
By: shooter686. on 21 Jul 10, 17:38:40
49 years from now, they will say the same thing about the scientists? today.
By: piebaldify. on 10 Jul 10, 01:28:36
i mean yeah but 40 years ago they sucked at that kind of thing. we've made a couple advancements in science since then... and we've had record breaking temperatures every summer for the past 10 years.. i mean i guess its possible that its devine punishment or a left wing conspiracy to take over the world? and al gore is the next hitler and the environmentalists are the hitler youth... i'm not SAYING thats true i'm just saying its EXACTLY LIKE THAT..
By: joeyguy1986. on 09 Jul 10, 14:51:30
He was proving that the doom and gloom prophecies the environmentalists were throwing out in the 1970s were absolutely false when they were crying about global cooling. How are we to believe them now when they are? crying about global warming when all the things they predicted in 1970 never happened.
By: piebaldify. on 07 Jul 10, 20:50:27
lol these are all quotes from 1970, a? little dated are we glenn?
By: lpvine. on 25 Aug 09, 16:51:38
Regarding the comment on mass starvation: about one billion people are currently suffering from malnutrition and hunger, and according to? Wikipedia, 31,536,000 die from outright starvation every year. So it's not *too* crazy of a prediction.
By: kohlerman8. on 08 May 09, 20:39:26
Such exaggeration only hurts the environmental movement in the long run by underlying its basic credibility. There are valid environmental concerns but they are not helped by scare? tactics.
By: h0peandchange. on 26 Apr 09, 05:21:53
Maybe the climate is changing. Climates have shifted on Earth -many- times, long before man was even a thought. There's not one shred of scientific evidence that man causes it by releasing CO2, the life-giving gas breathed by plants. Why is it a problem if there's .000001% more CO2 now than 150 years ago? There have certainly been much more radical changes than that over the last 100,000 years. Also, why does NOAA measure CO2 levels on an active volcano? Wouldn't? that toss off the results a bit?
By: nextdrink45. on 24 Apr 09, 17:29:10
Why don't you live in the real world and accept the fact that you have been FOOLED into believing? that Global Warming even exists?? Besides, the NASA websitel is so effing boring!
By: nextdrink45. on 24 Apr 09, 08:54:32
This PROVES that all the Enviro-Freaks came out of the woodwork about every 20 - 30 years! In the 70's it was "Global Cooling", now 30 years later, it's "Global Warming." I've been? laughing at all the Enviro-Freaks for a long time!!! Please keep making me laugh!!