Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
ThoughtBite: Gadaffi and his ilk--can dictators sometimes be a good thing? Posted by: wonderingmind42
Video duration: 221 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Further Reading: Global Warming - Climate Change - Energy - Recycling - Pollution
Latest articles: Facts about solar energy ~ Pros and cons of solar energy ~ How does solar energy work ~ Solar energy advantages disadvantages ~ Types of energy ~ Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy ~ Who are the world's 1 renewable energy site? ~ How does recycling affect the environment? ~ Why is recycling so important? ~ Interesting recycling facts ~ Natural causes of global warming ~ Is global warming real? ~ Safe and clean energy ~ Effects of water pollution ~ Types of water pollution ~ Land pollution ~ Poems about pollution ~ Definition of climate change ~ Fiji social capital community meetings climate change
Latest comments made on this video:
By: 2110kop. on 29 Jul 11, 19:07:30
There is a quick simple solution to global warming and climate change. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion.?? As worked on Star Scientific.? NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. The source is dueterium from the? World's Oceans? - virtually limitless. It is? cheap to produce.?? WE NEED IT NOW. See the website "Star Scientific Limited", Blog "The Big Picture? by Andrew Horvath", Youtube video - "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
By: Rasbutin7000. on 01 May 11, 14:54:44
i CLICKED ON THIS BECAUSE YOU LOOKED LIKE? ANGERY GERMAN KID XD
By: capemall. on 19 Dec 10, 04:28:52
Next? time just say no.
By: dinos98. on 30 Nov 10, 22:50:53
Sorry It's a little late but I have? a title for you " HOW TO BE A DUMBSHIT PUPPET FOR THE GLOBALIST'S AND NOT EVEN KNOW IT!"
By: SMesbah. on 08 Nov 10, 19:23:23
i am glad AGU is doing this... i hope it? goes well... i would love to see the video :-)
By: Saltedkoshersalami. on 04 Oct 10, 00:52:41
@stuntbaby63 "Does it mean the mass slaughter of human beings" nice job fear mongering,how hypocritical.typical accusing the left of scaring? people on way, when the right also scares them one way. you only listen to people that share your political beliefs. the brainwashee,you, believes everyone else has been brainwashed but never suspects himself. im saying this as a general blanket statement and its not just directed at you but most of us as well.
By: Saltedkoshersalami. on 04 Oct 10, 00:41:47
@stuntbaby63 tell me more about the latest FW FW FW conservative chain letter. keep on spouting off anecdotal examples to prove your point. did you hear about? example X. yeah? well it disproves Y. look pal either shut up or back up your claims with solid evidence. also if global warming exists,shouldnt public-spirited people spread the word of why we should watch out for it? it will be funny to hear what you think the ulterior motives are behind global warming .
By: stuntbaby63. on 02 Oct 10, 05:11:47
@Saltedkoshersalami Have you seen the promotional ad for the 10:10 Initiative? Well-meaning, die-hard believers of global warming confront the reality that some folks just don't share their Chicken Little views. So, as they seemingly accept the "deniers" with calm assurance that there's "No pressure" and "It's your choice" the 10:10 organizers press a red button in a black box and instantly blow up these bad eggs in a disgusting shower of blood and guts. (1010global) Is that? "progress" to you?
By: stuntbaby63. on 02 Oct 10, 04:53:29
@Saltedkoshersalami wrote, "I'm for progress." Well, I'm for progress, too! But what does the word mean? Does it mean bigger government? Does it mean an end to wealth production, free markets and human liberty? Does it mean the mass slaughter of human beings for the purpose of reverting to a simpler lifestyle without cars, factories, or any other eco-unfriendly product of human activity?? What do you mean by "progress"? Pease define the word for me. Thanks.
By: stuntbaby63. on 02 Oct 10, 04:27:45
@Saltedkoshersalami wrote, "its too bad you've cast off 'the whole science community'". I haven't. I fully trust and respect those scientists who have the guts to stand up to the bullies in power and say that all this Global Warming nonsense is a big hoax. Can't you see what's going on? Shouldn't you be suspicious? I am. Why aren't you? Why? are you so eager to have some big intrusive gov't micro-manage our lives and rob us of our freedoms supposedly for the benefit of polar bears?
By: stuntbaby63. on 02 Oct 10, 04:21:23
@Saltedkoshersalami How does? any of what you wrote prove me wrong? What exactly IS your point...that Christianity isn't perfect? Anything placed in the hands of flawed humans will undoubtedly be flawed. You'll get no argument from me on that score. But if you believe that there would have been less evil and more good in the world had Christianity never been founded, then I would have to disagree with you.
By: stuntbaby63. on 02 Oct 10, 04:13:14
@Saltedkoshersalami If you think about it, your history lesson really doesn't invalidate my point. If anything, it validates it. Constantine? had to adapt to a changing world that was quickly embracing a new view of the human experience. I'm not asking you to accept Christian values. I'm definitely not asking you to believe Christian theology. All I'm asking you to do is accept the proposition that a society that believes in God is profoundy different from one that rejects Him. Fair point?
By: stuntbaby63. on 02 Oct 10, 04:05:29
@Saltedkoshersalami wrote, "You mean babies are no longer being killed in this world?" No. How do you conclude that from what I wrote? My point was that a simple shift from a polytheistic concept of gods in nature to a monotheistic concept of God in nature profoundly impacted the world. The Romans saw no value in a baby's life so tossing one out like garbage was thought to be OK. Pantheism is worse because it views babies as CO2 polluters who SHOULD be killed for the good of the planet. ?
By: Saltedkoshersalami. on 02 Oct 10, 02:15:23
maybe we as leftists should stop listening to the entire military community in the united states for lying about WMDS. maybe we should also stop listening to anti-gay right wingers because of their hypocritical actions of living the gay life. you have yet to provide solid proof though? about when the scientific community has lied about global warming.
By: Saltedkoshersalami. on 02 Oct 10, 02:15:18
@stuntbaby63 also im interesting the source you can come up with for this Rogers fellow (probably a republican shill site). its too bad you've cast off "the whole science community" as a bunch of crock fueled by barry soetoro and the democrats as a way to steal your freedom. perhaps you'd feel more comfortable living a few hundred years into the past where claiming the earth was round could land you a death sentence for using science to state facts? not adhering to the bible.
By: Saltedkoshersalami. on 02 Oct 10, 02:11:44
@stuntbaby63 ironically Christians would persecute Pagans after they themselves came to power,along with the rest of the world for the next 2000 years. Anyway the roman empire was plagued with a plethora of reasons:? Decline in Morals and Values Public Health Political Corruption Unemployment Inflation Urban decay Inferior Technology Military Spending
By: Saltedkoshersalami. on 02 Oct 10, 02:00:46
@stuntbaby63 oh word? you mean babies are no longer being killed in this world. thank god for judeo-christianity. also heres a little history? lesson since you probably know as much about history as you do science. i guess thats a given though since both are heavily entrenched in leftist ideology hmm? anyway the roman empire was already crippling. constantine who at first opposed xtianity latched onto it to unify the empire. much like all religions are founded to do, unify a people against X
By: Saltedkoshersalami. on 02 Oct 10, 01:58:15
@stuntbaby63? im for progress. you are for lower taxes and bible thumping.
By: stuntbaby63. on 30 Sep 10, 23:44:00
@Saltedkoshersalami Please explain what "tea-bagger logic" is. What is a "tea-bagger" in your opinion? You claimed I have "GOP overlords" but your argument seems to be a defense of the overlords the Tea Party folks are protesting. Obama's agenda attacks our individual liberties on almost every level. Cap and Trade. ObamaCare. The Fairness Doctrine. Immigration Reform. You name any Leftist policy and it will reduce us? to wards of intrusive government. I'm for freedom. What are you for?
By: stuntbaby63. on 30 Sep 10, 23:20:49
@Saltedkoshersalami My defense is a joke? How so? I'm making a case that the science that supposedly ends the debate about so-called "global warming" (a.k.a "climate change" or "climate disruption") is? full of holes. I'm making a case that the whole science community has been hijacked by frauds who are invested in Leftist political agendas and NOT in objective truth. Is it "crazy tea-bagger logic" to take words and their meanings seriously? Rogers is who he is and he said what he said.
By: stuntbaby63. on 30 Sep 10, 22:18:37
@Saltedkoshersalami I want to live in a country founded by God-fearing? people who believe: 1) Human life is sacred and infinitely valuable. 2) Each human is endowed, by God, with unalienable rights. 3) Animal life is less valuable than human life. I would NOT want to live in a country founded by atheists who believe: 1) Human life has no intrinsic value. 2) Each human is endowed, by gov't, with alienable rights. 3) Human and animal life is equal. Does this distinction make sense?
By: stuntbaby63. on 30 Sep 10, 21:56:39
@Saltedkoshersalami Hi again! Yes, human rights are protected or violated by human beings who have the power to protect or violate them. But that's a given. My point is that a belief in God has a profoundly different impact? on society than a disbelief in God. I mean, consider how the Roman Empire was rocked to its core by the concept of a single God existing outside of nature. Unwanted babies had been routinely tossed out on trash piles. But Judeo-Christianity made such acts look evil.
By: Saltedkoshersalami. on 30 Sep 10, 05:37:17
@stuntbaby63 also human rights are a social construct. think about it, why are human rights different in one part of the world and not the other? my? point is human rights are dictated by the status-quo not some supreme being.