Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
Visiting with Ben Beard (3 of 3) Posted by: IlovemyGlock21
Video duration: 901 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Further Reading: Global Warming - Climate Change - Energy - Recycling - Pollution
Latest articles: Facts about solar energy ~ Pros and cons of solar energy ~ How does solar energy work ~ Solar energy advantages disadvantages ~ Types of energy ~ Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy ~ Who are the world's 1 renewable energy site? ~ How does recycling affect the environment? ~ Why is recycling so important? ~ Interesting recycling facts ~ Natural causes of global warming ~ Is global warming real? ~ Safe and clean energy ~ Effects of water pollution ~ Types of water pollution ~ Land pollution ~ Poems about pollution ~ Definition of climate change ~ Fiji social capital community meetings climate change
Latest comments made on this video:
By: drkstrong. on 11 Aug 10, 09:12:38
The lab experiments (as reported in Nature last year) show that if you double CO2 you? get more biomass in some plants (C3) not others (C4). Even then it is not much but you dont get increased nutrition - thats determined not by CO2 but but the nutrients in the soil. That thats not the full story though - in the real climate CO2 causes increased temperatures which reduces soil moisture content which stunts growth. In places currenly most affected by GW crop production is down
By: IlovemyGlock21. on 11 Aug 10, 01:33:44
- What do have to say about the? claim that plant growth is accelerated in the presence of increased CO2 and this might have a beneficial effect upon the biosphere?
By: drkstrong. on 11 Aug 10, 01:09:22
As the data presented here is fraudulent the conclusions that "There is no eveidence that past CO2 rises, current CO2 rise, or future CO2 rises has caused, is causing or will cause global warming" has no basis in fact - the evidence gathered by the scientific community is the? exact opposite of what is stated here.
By: drkstrong. on 11 Aug 10, 01:02:28
The numbers on CO2 vs? water vapor are another frabrication (t=10:00) - it only accounts for 80-85% of the GHG effect (not 95%) which makes Earth warmer by about 34 C. So about 4C of that is due to GHGs like CO2. As we have increased the CO2 in the atmosphere by 30% tjhat should mean that increased Temperature about 1C, which is what is exactly what has happened - QED!
By: drkstrong. on 11 Aug 10, 00:47:54
OK, the global temperature anomally dropped (t=4:15) in January 2008? by 0.6C but they forget to mention that two months later the curve is back way above the trend line again. Despite an unusually cold January and february, by the end of the year 2008 had become the 9th warmest year on record. Without those two months it would have been the second warmest year on record.
By: drkstrong. on 11 Aug 10, 00:38:36
The solar activity plot is a complete fake (t=3:28) It has a minimum in near 1960 which was actuall during the largest burst of solar activity recorded in 400 years! If you dont believe me google "sunspot number" and look at solar cycle 19 (1954-1965) and compare it to the? other cycles. Ah you say that is sunspot number but we are plotting solar irradiance - OK google Lockwood Stamper 1999 Long-term drift of the coronal source magnetic flux and the total solar irradiance look at Figure 4
By: drkstrong. on 11 Aug 10, 00:25:25
Lets deal with the 3000-y plot that implies that temperatures were warmer than today. 1st it is of the plot ends in 1950 so you can add nearly 1 C to that plot and it is very similar to the medieval warm period. 2nd there are? no error bars the further you go back the bigger the error bars 1000 years ago the error is about 1C, tripple that 3000 years. 3rd the plot is just for the Sagrasso Sea which is an anomalous area at low latitude where the GW is minimal unlike the poles. + other problems.
By: jalehirani1. on 07 Aug 10, 11:40:06
I think the most important reason for global warming is the number of humans, more than? 6 bilion people, every day make alot of methan gas, by fating, if every body do atleast 1 fart , its created alot of? gas in the air, its the most important, reason, plz dont fart, to save our earth,