Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
ThoughtBite: Gadaffi and his ilk--can dictators sometimes be a good thing? Posted by: wonderingmind42
Video duration: 221 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Further Reading: Global Warming - Climate Change - Energy - Recycling - Pollution
Latest articles: Facts about solar energy ~ Pros and cons of solar energy ~ How does solar energy work ~ Solar energy advantages disadvantages ~ Types of energy ~ Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy ~ Who are the world's 1 renewable energy site? ~ How does recycling affect the environment? ~ Why is recycling so important? ~ Interesting recycling facts ~ Natural causes of global warming ~ Is global warming real? ~ Safe and clean energy ~ Effects of water pollution ~ Types of water pollution ~ Land pollution ~ Poems about pollution ~ Definition of climate change ~ Fiji social capital community meetings climate change
Latest comments made on this video:
By: MiauZi69. on 07 Dec 11, 18:20:22
I really? learned a lot already in this video ... I had courses on how to do literature research, but till now I never heared of peer-review and of aaas (but thats because I am German ... I think). Ofc I heared of Science and Nature and their high standard, but now ... Thx! :)
By: m1aws. on 18 Oct 11, 20:59:48
lol. I love this video. Does? not stand up to the scrutiny of time. Ultimate proof AGW does not exist and all the sources speak through their pockets. I hope youtube doesn't delete this.
By: SSedmak. on 07 Oct 11, 00:25:04
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX It's not that complex. People say something that a politician likes, for whatever reason? Politician gives them more money to keep talking, and a symbiotic relationship develops. Simple patronage and politics is rife with it. Not? exactly a supervillain. A moron with a fat checkbook could do it.
By: apopheniacMCMLXXXIX. on 21 Aug 11, 11:37:44
@SSedmak Don't you think they'd come up with something a little less rube goldberg-esque? than "secretly manipulate the scientific community into creating lies about anthropogenic climate change so we can justify taxing people"? It sounds like some comic book super villain's super evil sinister master plan. Seriously ask yourself if this is at all realistic or whether it's born of some paranoid conspiracy fantasy.
By: SSedmak. on 21 Aug 11, 05:56:51
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX So...? After looking at 5000 years of human civilization, you've come to the conclusion that governments do not have a strong bias for aggregating power and taxing subjects? What history books did you read???
By: lars008. on 23 Jun 11, 08:34:36
eat? well excersize,,, die anyway,,, spend tons of money on idiotic social issues,,, die anyway,,, Sun remains a main sequence star, continually growing warmer and brighter by ~10% every 1 billion years. no matter what you do,,, the sun will GET you in the end,,, unless you LEAVE,,, that is where mankind needs to spend its money,,, on? LEAVING,,,
By: danielm2222. on 12 Jan 11, 17:49:31
What? do we do if we are not the ones causing "global warming"? Many scientists think that this is happening not just to the Earth, but to all planets in our Solar System. Of course, we may be accelerating the process, but in the scenario that I proposed, we cannot stop either, not even if we stop consuming oil or other natural resources like coal. I'm guessing that in that case, the best thing we can do is be prepared.
By: shadezofgrayfulness. on 10 Jan 11, 03:03:20
@phantomscolts2 "I understand a fury in your words, But not the words." Othello, Act IV, Scene II I may regret asking, but just for the sake of clarity, if you were Master of Global? Affairs with plenipotentiary powers, what course might you be inclined to set for human affairs on Earth?
By: limosalimosa. on 28 Oct 10, 19:39:20
oops? that was a reply to another comment of a year ago, not to your video.
By: limosalimosa. on 28 Oct 10, 19:37:24
On itself this is true. No-one will deny that you're able to use reason to some extent, Ron. Now guess what this worldwide legion of climate scientists has been trying to falsify over the last two decades? exactly this causation story. Time and again? they failed. They only disagree on nuances, not on the main story.
By: repap1a. on 25 Aug 10, 15:51:50
you should ccross? refernce your scale with personal (or organisations) benifits like money or power, and how these affect your source selection.
By: apopheniacMCMLXXXIX. on 18 Aug 10, 00:15:22
I never got this argument that the government is behind spreading the global warming "propaganda".The implications of climate change mean that the? gov will need to spend billions of dollars to fight it. Is it so they can tax us more? And hurt the economy in the process? What makes more sense, is oil companies spreading in anti-science propaganda. They stand to loose TRILLIONS of dollars if people take action on climate change. And this is exactly what's happening. So who has more of a bias?
By: tarcal87. on 01 May 10, 18:56:01
jesus you repeat yourself so much though,? praising those guys
By: FLPman. on 16 Apr 10, 19:02:03
@FLPman? sorry.. i meant i don't get why we struggle..
By: FLPman. on 16 Apr 10, 19:00:17
I just get why we struggle to hold on to our use of non renewable resource enegery.. global warming or not.. we're going to have (and are currently having) major issues. Imagine how global politics and conflicts would be affected if we as a society? were not interested in oil
By: FlashySenap. on 23 Mar 10, 04:21:07
LoL? watching this I feel that I cannot trust anything or anyone anymore XD
By: handplanty. on 09 Mar 10, 20:34:13
Really? I didn't know that, please cite your source. Who refuted them? If they said something similar to you, for example, I wouldn't be convinced. Plus, measures against global warming is costing the government millions, so I'd say it would be more logical for the government here to instruct NASA to disprove global warming, or to ridicule? it, rather than sending extensive earth and sun satelites up to study more of the climate. Unless, of course, they're doing science and they're just right...
By: Celebrindan. on 07 Mar 10, 07:44:49
@ArthurBiele It is proven, through core ice studies, that at? a point in the history of the earth, MOSS AND LICHENS changed the atmosphere and climate of the earth. Adding so much Oxygen to the atmosphere, that Plant and Animal life forms were forever changed. And you still don't think we can do it too?
By: ArthurBiele. on 15 Feb 10, 12:11:25
AAAs and the NAS have been totally refuted on their naieve stand on behalf of the human-caused global Warming myth. Are you man enough to admit your error in declaring them infallble. Their views were not scientifically established. They simply caved in to government powers that hire them and pay their salaries. It was not that hard for the powers that be to get? these two agencies to 'SEE' something there that wasn't there before. Now they get what they deserved, MUD ON THEIR FACES!
By: Paddis92. on 14 Jan 10, 18:23:00
There are people who have been members of the IPCC and have left because they weren't satisfied with the IPCC. After that, they remained in the IPCC's list of "Top 2500 scientists", or something similar, and when they had to threaten to take legal action for their name to be removed. I'm sceptical so the IPCC and their work because? of this and a lot of other things that simply make them lose a lot of credibility.
By: alexkvaskov. on 13 Dec 09, 23:51:20
It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001). This warming has already led to changes in the Earth's climate." source: nationalacademies? (dot) org/onpi/06072005 (dot) pdf
By: alexkvaskov. on 13 Dec 09, 23:50:10
"There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the worlds climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems.?
By: alexkvaskov. on 13 Dec 09, 23:49:27
Joint statement from 11 national academies of science. Issued 7 June 2005, by the national science academies of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, Germany, Japan, Italy, Canada,? Brazil, China and India, the statement begins with:
By: alexkvaskov. on 13 Dec 09, 23:45:19
how about the royal society in the uk? how about many other very respected think tanks and scientific communities around? the world?
By: alexkvaskov. on 13 Dec 09, 22:21:52
there is one word for people like you, moaninglory:? scum