Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
George Galloway reads a knuckle dragging texter who is defending Saudi Arabia Posted by: taldari
Video duration: 51 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Further Reading: Global Warming - Climate Change - Energy - Recycling - Pollution
Latest articles: Facts about solar energy ~ Pros and cons of solar energy ~ How does solar energy work ~ Solar energy advantages disadvantages ~ Types of energy ~ Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy ~ Who are the world's 1 renewable energy site? ~ How does recycling affect the environment? ~ Why is recycling so important? ~ Interesting recycling facts ~ Natural causes of global warming ~ Is global warming real? ~ Safe and clean energy ~ Effects of water pollution ~ Types of water pollution ~ Land pollution ~ Poems about pollution ~ Definition of climate change ~ Fiji social capital community meetings climate change
Latest comments made on this video:
By: checkyoursources. on 09 May 12, 15:08:21
Marc Morono prefers to take advice from a plumber than a doctor on medical treatments. Imbecile doesn't even get close to his lack? of scientific expertise
By: anarchosolar. on 07 Apr 12, 03:34:37
Gore is NOT climate? change he is a distraction...climate change is real .
By: Whatever104104. on 06 Apr 12, 22:36:17
Scientists are acutely aware of which way the wind is blowing and orientate themselves in the best way to ensure future funding. AGW has become such an unopposable juggernaut that all scientists "agree" with it in the same way that all German scientists "agreed" with Nazi science in? the thirties. To oppose it would be career suicide. The old adage "follow the money" sums it all up nicely.
By: Whatever104104. on 06 Apr 12, 22:32:46
All cloud is seeded by cosmic rays and clouds are the screens of the? greenhouse reflecting solar radiation away. The amount of cosmic rays reaching the atmosphere is altered by the amount of solar wind sent out by sunspot activity. That is what modulates global temperatures.
By: guwest2. on 31 Mar 12, 07:15:53
Gore isn't a credible commentator on GW. He has no scientific qualifications. Does? that sound familiar, Monckton ('scientific adviser to Thatcher', LOL)?
By: ChristopherMonckton5. on 28 Feb 12, 17:34:06
The only green in Gore is the money he is looking to rip off from? this carbon tax scam
By: bazle64. on 24 Feb 12, 04:07:50
Caller? is misinformed uneducucated far right fool
By: nlpjohn. on 07 Jan 12, 21:38:45
Yes 550 mya, the CO2 levels were 20x our pre-industrial CO2 baselines and positive feedback did NOT happen w/ CO2 and temp... Their reply? is to claim the sun was cooler. My counter response is 'Oh?, Was the sun 20x cooler'?
By: ilma630. on 06 Jan 12, 16:41:59
Al Bore is a complete joke. If his lips move it means he's lying (if they don't move then he's thinking what lie to say next). The changing climate has nothing to do with man's emissions, even the global temperature record compared to the CO2 record don't correlate, disproving the hypothesis. Even if they did correlate, that doesn't? prove or even demonstrate causation. They could have a common 3rd driver, or be totally coincidental. Funny how quiet Al has been recently!
By: Mrbullydog66. on 02 Jan 12, 12:32:27
O2 was higher in the past "The killer proof that CO2 does not drive climate is to be found during? the Ordovician- Silurian and the Jurassic-Cretaceous periods when CO2 levels were greater than 4000 ppmv (parts per million by volume) and about 2000 ppmv respectively. If the IPCC theory is correct there should have been runaway greenhouse induced global warming during these periods but instead there was glaciation."
By: Mrbullydog66. on 02 Jan 12, 12:32:11
I saw a great analogy on this. 1 million rice grains = ppm air. 385 grains {ppm} = How much carbon there is currently in the air. 15 of those {ppm}? = From human activity = only (4%) [cars, energy, manufacturing etc] 1.8 grains {ppm}= Methane 0.31 grains {ppm} = Nitrous Oxide So out of 1 million ppm Man is responsible for a staggering15 ppm! Continued.........
By: YaHuWaHservant. on 30 Dec 11, 14:06:33
Don't get me wrong pollution has alot of negative consequences, even more the more pollution their? is, but climate change is not one of them.
By: YaHuWaHservant. on 30 Dec 11, 14:06:05
As I understand it the debate is not whether their is climate change. The debate is to the why. The big names and money wanting people say it is man made. They want? us to do carbon caps and such; which will do nothing for carbon being produced merely allow government/businesses to profit from pollution. The other part of the spectrum are scientists saying it is not man made and that it is a natural occurrence that planets go through. I am on the latter personally.
By: historypoliticsbb. on 30 Dec 11, 09:59:34
There's no? evidence to suggest that unicorns are NOT real.
By: N1k1mon. on 18 Dec 11, 13:05:25
fraud that it is. And from the sound of things with that caller, it's dying a painful, yet drawn out, howling, whimpering death thanks to these hacks like Algore,? who surely have so much invested and riding on these deceptions. Hopefully the residual fears and concerns will be enough to slap some sense into those who don't care about the environment in a decent, healthy and proper way. My choice as a boy was if my Native American friends were the last to truly live off the land here, I shoul
By: N1k1mon. on 18 Dec 11, 13:02:20
close to what's necessary for knowing what needs to be known by our current understanding of the worlds climate. Thank heaven there are so many clues to? find and ways to truly get a good, solid understanding of how the climate has behaved the world over, for many thousands of years up to millions I'm sure, using certain methods and more will he forthcoming in order to out this baby to bed once and for all. In the end, and it's happening quickly, this subterfuge will be fully exposed for the fr
By: N1k1mon. on 18 Dec 11, 12:58:23
wise decision, and in most cases the? best bet and most reasonable choice possible. However he said rightly, it's always healthy to have skeptics and challenges to prevailing orthodoxy of the day, in whatever day that may be. On this one Galloway just happens to be dealing with a subject only recently (In comparison to most other hard sciences) become popular, highly politicized from the beginning, and a science that simply can not look to observed data over any reasonable period of time even
By: N1k1mon. on 18 Dec 11, 12:55:07
Hearing GG say this is quite reassuring. I'd rather not have a bloody waffler, willing to turn over anytime anyone comes along with a new theory. When one does not have the ability, as he admitted, to be s climate scientist himself and pore over all the "YouTube data", and many websites that must be out there about this, and one simply ? has to choose a standard. Whatever they consider to be the best of the best institutions for furnishing that type of information to the public is undoubtedly a
By: Kingzeen. on 04 Dec 11, 00:28:44
Have you been living in a cave? How do you explain drastic increase? in GHG emissions synchronized with the the beginning of the industrial revolution?
By: lictor313. on 28 Nov 11, 17:09:40
as if the crypto communist galloway was an authority on any subject at all... a man who's? idea of freedom of speech is to incarcerate people who examine the holocaust and say unorthodox things about it...
By: todogfw. on 20 Nov 11, 03:46:02
I don't need science to tell me the climate is changing and the globe is warming. I've been alive for 40 years. I remember when 100 degrees was unthinkable, when dogwoods wouldn't winter? this far north, and when my area was not the proper climate for black widows and brown recluse. That has all changed in the last 15years and when I go outside to smake a cigarette at 10pm Nov.19th I'll be wearing a T-Shirt. People believe what they want inspite of evidence not because of it.
By: Antithropocentric. on 15 Nov 11, 07:03:37
At 4:24, the aptly named Mr. Morano is just pulling junk out? of a hat. You simply can't reach these deniers. By MorONo's criteria, a Jiffy Lube oil-changer should be trusted more than a senior automotive engineer on subtle questions of engine overheating. I could give many other analogies where lightweights and posers haven't earned the credentials to claim special knowledge of a given topic. Most people on the planet literally aren't smart enough to be scientists. Sorry, but that's true.
By: Antithropocentric. on 15 Nov 11, 06:56:53
@unclephil440, why do ignorant people always think they can state an entire case in a single sentence? If I stated that the Moon landing was a hoax, would I not need to? provide solid evidence for that claim? Never mind. Casting pearls to swine is wasted effort.
By: unclephil440. on 13 Oct 11, 21:16:56
The Climate? change theory is a hoax.