Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
Population research institute: misleading videos to further their religious agenda Posted by: checkyoursources
Video duration: 114 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Further Reading: Global Warming - Climate Change - Energy - Recycling - Pollution
Latest articles: Facts about solar energy ~ Pros and cons of solar energy ~ How does solar energy work ~ Solar energy advantages disadvantages ~ Types of energy ~ Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy ~ Who are the world's 1 renewable energy site? ~ How does recycling affect the environment? ~ Why is recycling so important? ~ Interesting recycling facts ~ Natural causes of global warming ~ Is global warming real? ~ Safe and clean energy ~ Effects of water pollution ~ Types of water pollution ~ Land pollution ~ Poems about pollution ~ Definition of climate change ~ Fiji social capital community meetings climate change
Latest comments made on this video:
By: checkyoursources. on 21 May 12, 17:13:15
It appears you have already assumed many things, so what does it matter whether I? confirm or reject your pre-concieved opinions? There are many words for an alleged deity, many of which are not the same as the ones you use, what is wrong with sky fairy? I note also that you use a gender- "Him". I say again, which specific part of the above video do you disagree with or are you just here by chance?
By: Vinsense2009. on 21 May 12, 17:06:11
Seeing as you are a scientist why are you posting videos critical of religious beliefs, particularily when your understanding of the nature of "God" is limited to you describing Him as a "sky fairy". As a scientist, and presumably an unbeliever in the unmeasureable, I? would expect that your forays into criticizing religion are for personal reasons and nothing to do with science. Can I assume that you believe that religion gets in the way of policies that are intended to fight "Cimate change"?
By: checkyoursources. on 21 May 12, 16:55:24
Seeing as I am a scientist and the likelyhood of a sky fairy? existing are low, gnosticism is not something relevant here. Please feel free to not make an ad hominem.
By: Vinsense2009. on 21 May 12, 16:45:51
What makes you think that? Perhaps a misunderstanding of my comment? It was tongue in cheek as I'm sure it requires no funding to run a Youtube channel. My congratulations for posting my comment and for having the courage to post your beliefs. Look up Gnosticism and you'll be interested in the similarities to our current Culture of Death "climate". Look up Straw Man argument too.?
By: checkyoursources. on 21 May 12, 16:36:58
Glad you? agree that the religious group "Population research institute" are bigots.
By: Vinsense2009. on 21 May 12, 16:20:17
This site? is funded by, Bigots R Us. Not cool.
By: TheCentralServices. on 16 Feb 12, 05:54:07
Agreed! It is high time to? abolish overpopulation and climate change!
By: checkyoursources. on 18 Jan 12, 08:47:25
Sky fairies won't? stop religious pronatalists from consuming their way out of a home planet
By: morgolvale. on 17 Jan 12, 23:06:07
RELIGION= Don? your blinders and walk towards the precipice ,god will save you when you fall
By: checkyoursources. on 11 Dec 11, 21:46:33
you said:"So far, food crops have been steadly out pacing population growth" did you read what the FAO stated:? "the? fact is that globally the rate of growth in yields of the major cereal crops has been steadily declining" FAO 2010 Also you ignored the vast numbers of people that don't have enough food and the fact that our intensive agricultural system is based on unsustainable, limited and rapidly becoming more expensive fossil fuels.
By: 1StoryImageFigure1. on 09 Dec 11, 17:04:51
Not what I read from numerours sources from numerous groups that have scince to bakc them up.? So far, food crops have been steadly out pacing population growth. Stop reading Malthus because it is bad for you.
By: checkyoursources. on 08 Dec 11, 08:20:33
you said: "I have checked the rsearch of overpopulation believers too. No? reviewed scientific journals? found". Read the Millennium ecosystem assessment's 5 VOLUMES of peer reviewed scientific journals from 120 countries indicating that the human pop multiplied by it's average consumption per capita is leading to a huge decline in ecosystem services. "the fact is that globally the rate of growth in yields of the major cereal crops has been steadily declining" FAO 2010
By: checkyoursources. on 08 Dec 11, 08:16:01
You said:"Capitalism is not about infinite growth". I completely disagree, look up the definition. e.g. creation of goods or services for profit, the accumulation of capital. you? said: "Birth and fertility rates are dropping and are pretty low in numerous countries", the average total fertility rate worldwide is 2.52, well above replacement rate. Whether it has stopped growing or not, 7 billion is unsustainable at even a low standard of living. Consumption also grows.
By: 1StoryImageFigure1. on 07 Dec 11, 18:41:51
Furthermore, I have checked the rsearch of overpopulation believers too. No reviewed scientific journals found. I have found umerous predictions of overpopulation doomsday scenarios failing to happen. Such as the Overpopulation Bomb. Or how humans? will need to create artificial islands to solve food shortages. I also found how food production is not being outpaced by population growht. Another failed prediction there.
By: checkyoursources. on 07 Dec 11, 18:37:36
58 national science academies agree that humans are using resources faster than they can be? recycled or replaced. We are overpopulated. PRI wants to ban all forms of contraception. This is probably because of their religious unscientific background.
By: 1StoryImageFigure1. on 07 Dec 11, 18:37:29
Birth and fertility rates are dropping and are pretty low in numerous countries. Enough land for everbody. Overpopulation doomsayers were wrong all the time. Green revoluton feeds billions of people. Etc. Capitalism? is not about infinite growth. It is about a few people controlling vast amounts of resources so that a few can profit. Gandhi said it best; Earth can support every man's needs not every man's greed. And capitalism is all about greed.
By: checkyoursources. on 07 Dec 11, 18:32:01
1) you said: "I have checked PRI's research" - if you had you would have noted than none of their "research" is? in any peer reviewed scientific journal. Please state their "evidence"? 2) Any economic system based on constant growth on a finite planet will fail-on that we agree.
By: 1StoryImageFigure1. on 07 Dec 11, 18:21:32
I am pro-choice, for sex education, and? an atheist. I have checked PRI's research and they are correct in that overpopulation is not a problem. The problem is capitalism. Very few people control vast amounts of resources. Simply lowing the population is not going to free those resources up. The capitalists will just increase the price and the poor people will still have terrible living conditions. Enviromental problems are caused by capitalism too.
By: checkyoursources. on 07 Dec 11, 08:13:28
If there were enough for everyone then? we wouldn't see decline in environmental quality plus the average standard of living wouldn't be one quarter of your standard of living. The population research institute is not a scientific organisation, nor do they publish in scientific journals, they want to ban all forms of contraception and turn women into baby factories. Both capitalsm and communism are based on growth, a scientific fail on a finite planet.
By: vmorgun. on 14 Nov 11, 02:49:30
THANK YOU FOR THE VIDEO!!! The criminals must be kept? in check! Overpopulation is a serious issue and must be solved humanely.
By: crazytalkerman. on 25 Jun 11, 13:56:13
You are absolutely right, it is not just that they oppose? abortion, they are right about, because the fetus is going to be a full grown human being, but they also think that taking contraception pills is murder
By: amperro. on 23 Jun 11, 23:36:34
Overpopulation might be mitigated by colonizing space, and birthrates are declining everywhere, so PRI has some? points. But opposition to artificial contraception CANNOT be defended. I notice that so many anti-abortion groups are also anti-contraception, yet they cloak themselves in shrouds of neutral scholarship. PRI's own website states their opposition to contraception, but you have to look pretty hard to find it. How is forcing women to breed any different than banning them from breeding?
By: checkyoursources. on 03 May 11, 23:25:44
it appears 6 people work for the religious organisation PRI.?
By: MannySteinerBleeky. on 02 May 11, 12:16:59
Things their evil? conspiracy covers up, so as to prevent use of natural and safe birth control: w w w sisterzeus(dot)com/HContra.htm astroelite(dot)com/article/astrology-fertility-en.asp - note how same idiots also wiped out herbalists in Europe, and shamanic cultures in the Americas also in the name of their religious interpretations. All that lost knowledge. Tibetian culture had knowledge on natural contraceptive plants too.
By: checkyoursources. on 26 Apr 11, 06:37:59
We need not go to an extreme like China did. If everyone was aware of the issues, the best solutions and had access to/ was shown how to use voluntary contraception properly, then? the population will fall to a more sustainable level without resorting to extremes. I would however say that paying people to have more kids is the stupidest idea ever.